NUFORC
National UFO Reporting Center — a U.S. civilian sighting-report intake service founded in 1974, operating the most comprehensive public sighting database in North America.
The National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC) is a Seattle-based civilian organization founded in 1974 by Robert J. Gribble, a former police officer. Its primary function is the intake and public archival of UFO/UAP sighting reports from members of the public.
How it works
NUFORC operates a 24-hour telephone hotline and an online submission form. Reports are received, lightly screened (for obvious abuse or duplication), and added to a public database that is searchable by date, state, country, shape, and duration. Unlike MUFON, NUFORC does not field-investigate the reports — its role is intake, transcription, and archive.
The NUFORC database, freely accessible at nuforc.org, contains over 150,000 reports spanning the organization’s history, making it the largest publicly searchable UFO sighting dataset in North America.
Strengths and limitations
Strengths:
- Public accessibility. Anyone can search the full database without registration or fee.
- Rapid intake. Reports often appear in the public database within 24 hours.
- Geographic coverage. Submissions arrive from throughout the U.S. and increasingly internationally.
- Time-series value. The 50-year continuous record allows analysis of long-term reporting patterns.
Limitations:
- No vetting. Reports are user-submitted and not verified.
- Selection bias. People who know to report to NUFORC are not a random sample of observers.
- Description quality varies. Witness descriptions range from highly detailed to cryptic.
Council usage
The Council treats NUFORC as a first-pass dataset — useful for establishing the existence of multi-witness sightings, geographic clustering, and reporting trends, but not as primary evidence on its own. NUFORC reports cited in Council case files are always cross-checked against independent sources before being treated as substantive.
The Council recommends NUFORC to readers wanting to understand the texture of public UAP reporting; serious investigation requires additional sources.